Buyer Resources

Procurement guides and buyer decision resources for government agencies

Oklahoma Public Protection Act pretrial risk assessment reform requiring validated tools for bail decisions
· Buyer Resources

Oklahoma’s Public Protection Act Exposes a Hard Truth: Electronic Monitoring Only Works When Risk Assessment Gets It Right

Governor Kevin Stitt signed Senate Bill 1618 into law last week, mandating that all 77 Oklahoma counties adopt validated pretrial risk assessment tools before setting bail. The legislation—officially named the Public Protection Act—takes effect November 1, 2026. On the surface, it reads like procedural reform. Beneath it lies one of the most important questions in […]

Read More →
CO-EYE ONE GPS ankle monitor - lightweight 108g one-piece design worn on ankle
· Buyer Resources

GPS Ankle Bracelet Comparison 2026: One-Piece vs Two-Piece Models — Weight, Battery, Tamper Detection & Total Cost

Agency buyers comparing GPS ankle bracelet architectures need more than marketing PDFs. This 2026 head-to-head analysis contrasts one-piece and two-piece GPS ankle bracelet designs across weight, battery life, tamper signaling, cellular readiness, installation labor, and total cost of ownership—grounded in procurement metrics and NIJ performance benchmarks.

Read More →
Ankle monitor cost daily fees and pricing guide
· Buyer Resources

Ankle Monitor Cost in 2026: What Agencies, Courts, and Bail Bond Companies Pay

Ankle monitor cost is one of the most searched questions in community corrections. This 2026 guide explains daily monitoring fees, activation charges, payer models, hidden operational costs, and annual TCO for GPS, RF, smartphone, and alcohol-monitoring modalities—plus how modern one-piece hardware and unified software change the supervision budget.

Read More →
GPS ankle monitor 61-point evaluation framework
· Buyer Resources

The 61-Point Evaluation Framework for GPS Ankle Monitors: NIJ Methodology for Agency Procurement

The 61-Point Evaluation Framework for GPS Ankle Monitors Based on the NIJ/JHU methodology for evaluating offender tracking systems, adapted for modern procurement. Figure 1: Notional Offender Monitoring System architecture, illustrating the four subsystems: offender-worn device, in-house monitoring, device vendor data center, and officer/agency interface. Source: NIJ Market Survey of Location-Based Offender Tracking Systems, JHU/APL (2016). […]

Read More →